Richardson-Self, L, Woman-hating: On misogyny, sexism, and hate speech, Hypatia, 33, (2) pp. 256-272. ISSN 0887-5367 (2018) [Refereed Article]
Copyright 2017 Hypatia, Inc.
Hate speech is one of the most important conceptual categories in anti-oppression politics today; a great deal of energy and political will is devoted to identifying, characterizing, contesting, and (sometimes) penalizing hate speech. However, despite the increasing inclusion of gender identity as a socially salient trait, antipatriarchal politics has largely been absent within this body of scholarship. Figuring out how to properly situate patriarchy-enforcing speech within the category of hate speech is therefore an important politico-philosophical project. My aim in this article is twofold: first, I argue that sexist speech, though oppressive, is not hate speech. Second, I argue that misogynistic speech is hate speech, even when it is intradivisional (that is, when it targets only subsets of women). This is important because recognizing that the concept hate speech applies to certain forms of patriarchy-enforcing speech is another step in clarifying what is wrong with the practice, and how bad it is in relation to other abuses. Consequently, this article provides a more nuanced account of the kinds of expressions that can and should count as instances of hate speech.
|Item Type:||Refereed Article|
|Keywords:||hate speech, misogyny, sexism, women, oppression|
|Research Division:||Philosophy and Religious Studies|
|Research Field:||Feminist Theory|
|Objective Division:||Law, Politics and Community Services|
|Objective Group:||Community Service (excl. Work)|
|Objective Field:||Gender and Sexualities|
|UTAS Author:||Richardson-Self, L (Dr Louise Richardson-Self)|
|Web of Science® Times Cited:||1|
|Deposited By:||Office of the School of Humanities|
Repository Staff Only: item control page