eCite Digital Repository

Experimental comparison between Mahoney and Complementary sensor fusion algorithm for attitude determination by raw sensor data of Xsens IMU on buoy

Citation

Jouybari, A and Ardalan, AA and Rezvani, M-H, Experimental comparison between Mahoney and Complementary sensor fusion algorithm for attitude determination by raw sensor data of Xsens IMU on buoy, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 7-10 October 2017, Tehran, pp. 497-502. ISSN 1682-1750 (2017) [Refereed Conference Paper]


Preview
PDF
906Kb
  

Copyright Statement

Copyright 2017 the Authors. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

DOI: doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W4-497-2017

Abstract

The accurate measurement of platform orientation plays a critical role in a range of applications including marine, aerospace, robotics, navigation, human motion analysis, and machine interaction. We used Mahoney filter, Complementary filter and Xsens Kalman filter for achieving Euler angle of a dynamic platform by integration of gyroscope, accelerometer, and magnetometer measurements. The field test has been performed in Kish Island using an IMU sensor (Xsens MTi-G-700) that installed onboard a buoy so as to provide raw data of gyroscopes, accelerometers, magnetometer measurements about 25 minutes. These raw data were used to calculate the Euler angles by Mahoney filter and Complementary filter, while the Euler angles collected by XSense IMU sensor become the reference of the Euler angle estimations. We then compared Euler angles which calculated by Mahoney Filter and Complementary Filter with reference to the Euler angles recorded by the XSense IMU sensor. The standard deviations of the differences between the Mahoney Filter, Complementary Filter Euler angles and XSense IMU sensor Euler angles were about 0.5644, 0.3872, 0.4990 degrees and 0.6349, 0.2621, 2.3778 degrees for roll, pitch, and heading, respectively, so the numerical result assert that Mahoney filter is precise for roll and heading angles determination and Complementary filter is precise only for pitch determination, it should be noted that heading angle determination by Complementary filter has more error than Mahoney filter.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Conference Paper
Keywords:xsens kalman filter, mahoney filter, complementary filter, integration, raw data, IMU
Research Division:Engineering
Research Group:Geomatic Engineering
Research Field:Surveying (incl. Hydrographic Surveying)
Objective Division:Environment
Objective Group:Climate and Climate Change
Objective Field:Climate Change Adaptation Measures
Author:Rezvani, M-H (Mr Mohammadhadi Rezvani)
ID Code:123446
Year Published:2017
Deposited By:Geography and Spatial Science
Deposited On:2018-01-09
Last Modified:2018-07-23
Downloads:25 View Download Statistics

Repository Staff Only: item control page