eCite Digital Repository

Non-natives: 141 scientists object

Citation

Simberloff, D and Johnson, C and Wright, J, 𝘦𝘵 𝘢𝘭, Non-natives: 141 scientists object, Nature, 475, (7354) pp. 36. ISSN 0028-0836 (2011) [Letter or Note in Journal]


Preview
PDF
Pending copyright assessment - Request a copy
349Kb
  

DOI: doi:10.1038/475036a

Abstract

We the undersigned feel that in advocating a change in the environmental management of introduced species (Nature 474, 153154; 2011), Mark Davis and colleagues assail two straw men.

First, most conservation biologists and ecologists do not oppose non-native species per se - only those targeted by the Convention on Biological Diversity as threatening "ecosystems, habitats or species". There is no campaign against all introductions: scarcity of resources forces managers to prioritize according to the impact of troublesome species, as in the Australian Weed Risk Assessment.

Second, invasion biologists and managers do not ignore the benefits of introduced species. They recognize that many non-native species curtail erosion and provide food, timber and other services. Nobody tries to eradicate wheat, for instance. Useful non-native species may sometimes still need to be managed because they have a negative impact, such as tree invasions that cause water loss in the South African fynbos.

Davis and colleagues downplay the severe impact of non-native species that may not manifest for decades after their introduction as occurred with the Brazilian pepper shrub (Schinus terebinthifolius) in Florida (J. J. Ewel in Ecology of Biological Invasions of North America and Hawaii (eds H. A. Mooney and J. A. Drake) 214230; Springer, 1986). Also, some species may have only a subtle immediate impact but affect entire ecosystems, for example through their effect on soils.

Pronouncing a newly introduced species as harmless can lead to bad decisions about its management. A species added to a plant community that has no evolutionary experience of that organism should be carefully watched.

For some introductions, eradication is possible. For example, 27 invasive species have been eradicated from the Galapagos Islands, mitigating severe adverse effects on endemic species. Harmful invasive species have been successfully kept in check by biological, chemical and mechanical means.

The public must be vigilant of introductions and continue to support the many successful management efforts.


(A complete list of authors can be found at:

https://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v475/n7354/extref/475036a-s1.pdf)

Item Details

Item Type:Letter or Note in Journal
Keywords:introduced species, invasive species, environmental management
Research Division:Environmental Sciences
Research Group:Ecological Applications
Research Field:Invasive Species Ecology
Objective Division:Environment
Objective Group:Control of Pests, Diseases and Exotic Species
Objective Field:Control of Pests, Diseases and Exotic Species not elsewhere classified
Author:Johnson, C (Professor Christopher Johnson)
Author:Wright, J (Dr Jeffrey Wright)
ID Code:121393
Year Published:2011
Deposited By:Zoology
Deposited On:2017-09-27
Last Modified:2017-09-27
Downloads:0

Repository Staff Only: item control page