eCite Digital Repository

The Raised Spectre of Silencing ‘Political’ and ‘Environmental’ Protest: Will the High Court Find the Workplaces (Protection from Protesters) Act 2014 (Tas) Impermissibly Infringes the Constitutionally Implied Freedom of Political Communication in Brown v The State of Tasmania?

Citation

Bartlett, W, The Raised Spectre of Silencing Political' and Environmental' Protest: Will the High Court Find the Workplaces (Protection from Protesters) Act 2014 (Tas) Impermissibly Infringes the Constitutionally Implied Freedom of Political Communication in Brown v The State of Tasmania?, University of Tasmania Law Review, 36, (1) pp. i-xxxiv. ISSN 0082-2108 (2017) [Refereed Article]


Preview
PDF (The Raised Spectre of Silencing ‘Political’ and ‘Environmental’ Protest)
Pending copyright assessment - Request a copy
587Kb

Preview
PDF
Pending copyright assessment - Request a copy
641Kb

Abstract

Brown v The State of Tasmania is an implied freedom of political communication challenge which was heard by the Full Bench of the High Court in May 2017. The two Plaintiffs have impugned the constitutional validity of the Tasmanian ‘anti-protest’ legislation, the Workplaces (Protection from Protesters) Act 2014 (Tas). This article argues that the Act impermissibly infringes the constitutionally implied freedom of political communication because it does not pursue a legitimate legislative purpose under the second limb of the Lange test. In making this argument, it is submitted that in a graduated series of implied freedom challenges, Lange’s requirement that an impugned law pursue a legitimate legislative purpose has been significantly elevated by the High Court in the 20 years since. As such, the article fills a lacuna in the literature by exploring the content of this higher constitutional criterion of validity, focusing specifically on the reasoning of Hayne J in Monis v The Queen and the McCloy plurality’s recent articulation of the implied freedom’s ‘protective’ function. The article then applies McCloy’s new test of structured proportionality and concludes that, even if the Act pursues a legitimate legislative purpose, it is neither ‘necessary’ nor ‘adequate in its balance’

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Keywords:implied freedom of political communication, High Court, legitimate legislative purpose, anti-protest laws, Tasmania, challenge, constitutionality, proportionality, McCloy, Monis, Unions NSW v NSW, true legislative purpose
Research Division:Law and Legal Studies
Research Group:Law
Research Field:Constitutional Law
Objective Division:Law, Politics and Community Services
Objective Group:Justice and the Law
Objective Field:Law Reform
Author:Bartlett, W (Mr William Bartlett)
ID Code:121330
Year Published:2017
Deposited By:Law
Deposited On:2017-09-23
Last Modified:2017-09-25
Downloads:0

Repository Staff Only: item control page