eCite Digital Repository

A conceptual model for reflecting on expected learning vs. demonstrated student performance

Citation

Gluga, R and Kay, J and Lister, R and Simon, S and Charleston, M and Harland, J and Teague, D, A conceptual model for reflecting on expected learning vs. demonstrated student performance, Proceedings of the 15th Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE2013), January - February 2013, Adelaide, South Australia, pp. 1-10. (2013) [Refereed Conference Paper]


Preview
PDF
741Kb
  

Copyright Statement

Copyright 2013 Australian Computer Society, Inc.

Official URL: https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2667208

Abstract

Educators are faced with many challenging questions in designing an effective curriculum. What prerequisite knowledge do students have before commencing a new subject? At what level of mastery? What is the spread of capabilities between bare-passing students vs. the top-performing group? How does the intended learning speci cation compare to student performance at the end of a subject? In this paper we present a conceptual model that helps in answering some of these questions. It has the following main capabilities: capturing the learning speci cation in terms of syllabus topics and outcomes; capturing mastery levels to model progression; capturing the minimal vs. aspi- rational learning design; capturing con dence and reli- ability metrics for each of these mappings; and nally, comparing and re ecting on the learning speci cation against actual student performance. We present a web- based implementation of the model, and validate it by mapping the nal exams from four programming subjects against the ACM/IEEE CS2013 topics and outcomes, using Bloom's Taxonomy as the mastery scale. We then import the itemised exam grades from 632 students across the four subjects and compare the demonstrated student performance against the ex- pected learning for each of these. Key contributions of this work are the validated conceptual model for capturing and comparing expected learning vs. demon- strated performance, and a web-based implementation of this model, which is made freely available online as a community resource.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Conference Paper
Keywords:curriculum, assessment, course content
Research Division:Education
Research Group:Education Systems
Research Field:Higher Education
Objective Division:Education and Training
Objective Group:Teaching and Instruction
Objective Field:Teaching and Instruction Technologies
Author:Charleston, M (Associate Professor Michael Charleston)
ID Code:121079
Year Published:2013
Deposited By:Mathematics and Physics
Deposited On:2017-09-08
Last Modified:2017-11-18
Downloads:13 View Download Statistics

Repository Staff Only: item control page