University of Tasmania
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Why the Persistent Absence of a Foundational Principle? Indigenous Australians, Proprietary and Family Reparations

chapter
posted on 2023-05-22, 18:12 authored by Hocking, BA, Stephenson, M
This chapter illustrates how, in the last few years, Australian society has tried to compensate Aboriginal peoples for the past governmental policy aimed at speeding up their extinction, which was seen as a natural consequence of the human evolutionary process. It gives special attention to the shameful practice of the 'Stolen Generation', for which the State of Tasmania has very recently announced a compensation package. It looks at the practice of compensation for indigenous property rights in Australia, representing a key issue to emerge from the Australian High Court's decision in Mabo v State of Queensland (No 2) of 1992. It is argued that, despite the incremental 'pockets' of compensation which have recently emerged for Aboriginal peoples in the areas of property, constitutional, labour, and tort law, the inadequacies of the contemporary Australian legal system in this context are a consequence of the absence of a federal Bill of Rights in Australia.

History

Publication title

Reparations for Indigenous Peoples: International and Comparative Perspectives

Editors

F Lenzerini

Pagination

477-522

ISBN

978-019169666-4

Department/School

Faculty of Law

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Place of publication

United Kingdom

Extent

21

Rights statement

Copyright 2008 Oxford University Press

Repository Status

  • Restricted

Socio-economic Objectives

Justice and the law not elsewhere classified

Usage metrics

    University Of Tasmania

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC