eCite Digital Repository
Reply to the Nahm and Hassler commentary on Jürgen Keil's paper 'questions of the reincarnation type'
Citation
Keil, J, Reply to the Nahm and Hassler commentary on Jurgen Keil's paper 'questions of the reincarnation type', Journal of Scientific Exploration, 25, (2) pp. 319-320. ISSN 0892-3310 (2011) [Letter or Note in Journal]
 | PDF Not available 114Kb |
Abstract
Based on reports and publications, I do not find it difficult to agree with Hassler
and Nahm that my psi-based interpretations of CORTs may not be justified.
However, based on fieldwork investigations of many cases over a number of
years, the reincamation or survival interpretation tumed out to be less and
less in agreement with the case studies as I experienced them. This is to some
extent a subjective assessment, but one which I did not anticipate. I have some
general doubts about survival views when they are expressed with a high
degree of certainty, but on account of my association with Ian Stevenson—
who encouraged me to investigate CORTs—and my high regard for his work,
I expected that the results from my fieldwork would generally support the
reincamation or survival hypothesis.
Item Details
| Item Type: | Letter or Note in Journal |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | reincarnation |
| Research Division: | Psychology and Cognitive Sciences |
| Research Group: | Psychology |
| Research Field: | Psychology not elsewhere classified |
| Objective Division: | Expanding Knowledge |
| Objective Group: | Expanding Knowledge |
| Objective Field: | Expanding Knowledge through Studies of Human Society |
| Author: | Keil, J (Dr H Keil) |
| ID Code: | 119144 |
| Year Published: | 2011 |
| Deposited By: | Psychology |
| Deposited On: | 2017-07-26 |
| Last Modified: | 2017-07-26 |
| Downloads: | 0 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page