University of Tasmania
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Why are initial estimates of productivity growth so unreliable?

journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-19, 07:46 authored by Jacobs, JPAM, van Norden, S

This paper argues that initial estimates of productivity growth will tend to be much less reliable than those of most other macroeconomic aggregates, such as output or employment growth. Two distinct factors complicate productivity measurement. (1) When production increases, factor inputs typically increase as well. Productivity growth is therefore typically less variable than output growth, meaning that measurement errors will tend to be relatively more important. (2) Revisions to published estimates of production and factor inputs tend to be less highly correlated than the published estimates themselves. This further increases the impact of data revisions on published productivity estimates.

To assess the extent of these problems in practice, we detail the importance of historical revisions to the most commonly-used measures of US aggregate productivity growth, expanding on previous empirical work by Aruoba (2008) and Anderson and Kliesen (2006). We find that such revisions have contributed substantially to policymakers' forecast errors for US productivity growth.

History

Publication title

Journal of Macroeconomics

Volume

47

Pagination

200-213

ISSN

0164-0704

Department/School

TSBE

Publisher

Louisiana State Univ Pr

Place of publication

Baton Rouge, USA, La, 70893

Rights statement

©2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Repository Status

  • Restricted

Socio-economic Objectives

Fiscal policy

Usage metrics

    University Of Tasmania

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC