eCite Digital Repository

Is risk consistent across tier-based harvest control rule management systems? A comparison of four case-studies


Dichmont, CM and Punt, AE and Dowling, N and de Oliviera, JAA and Little, LR and Sporcic, M and Fulton, EA and Gorton, R and Klaer, N and Haddon, M and Smith, D, Is risk consistent across tier-based harvest control rule management systems? A comparison of four case-studies, Fish and Fisheries, 17, (3) pp. 731-747. ISSN 1467-2960 (2016) [Refereed Article]

Copyright Statement

Copyright 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

DOI: doi:10.1111/faf.12142


There can be substantial differences in data quality and quantity among fished species. Consequently, the quality and type of assessments can also vary substantially. However, all species, especially those that are targeted, need to be managed. Several jurisdictions have developed hierarchical tier systems that categorize stocks based on, for example, the data available for assessment purposes and/or the extent to which quantities on which management advice is based can be estimated. Four case-studies (Australia's Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery, the USA west coast groundfishery, the USA Alaskan crab fishery and EU fisheries) are used to contrast the types of hierarchical tier systems available, and to assess the extent to which each system constrains risk to be equivalent among the tiers (termed risk equivalency). Only the Australian system explicitly aims to achieve risk equivalency. However, this intent has not been fully operationalized. Our review reveals that best practice is not to define tiers simply on data availability, but also on what the assessments based on those data are capable of estimating. In addition, clearly differentiating the quantification of uncertainty from how decision-makers wish to address that uncertainty would simplify justification of buffers (the gap between the assessment-produced target catch or effort and the final management decision that accounts for uncertainty and risk). Risk equivalency can be achieved using management strategy evaluation to select the values for control variables, which determine the buffer given the uncertainty associated with the assessment.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Keywords:data limited, data rich, fisheries management, management strategy evaluation, precaution, risk trade-offs
Research Division:Agricultural, Veterinary and Food Sciences
Research Group:Fisheries sciences
Research Field:Fisheries management
Objective Division:Animal Production and Animal Primary Products
Objective Group:Fisheries - aquaculture
Objective Field:Fisheries - aquaculture not elsewhere classified
UTAS Author:Little, LR (Dr Richard Little)
UTAS Author:Fulton, EA (Dr Elizabeth Fulton)
UTAS Author:Smith, D (Dr David Smith)
ID Code:118332
Year Published:2016
Web of Science® Times Cited:19
Deposited By:Directorate
Deposited On:2017-07-10
Last Modified:2018-05-09

Repository Staff Only: item control page