eCite Digital Repository

Quantifying the relative irreplaceability of important bird and biodiversity areas

Citation

di Marco, M and Brooks, T and Cuttelod, A and Fishpool, LDC and Rondinini, C and Smith, RJ and Bennun, L and Butchart, SHM and Ferrier, S and Foppen, RPB and Joppa, L and Juffe-Bignoli, D and Knight, AT and Lamoreux, JF and Langhammer, PF and May, I and Possingham, HP and Visconti, P and Watson, JEM and Woodley, S, Quantifying the relative irreplaceability of important bird and biodiversity areas, Conservation Biology, 30, (2) pp. 392-402. ISSN 0888-8892 (2016) [Refereed Article]

Copyright Statement

Copyright 2015 Society for Conservation Biology

DOI: doi:10.1111/cobi.12609

Abstract

World governments have committed to increase the global protected areas coverage by 2020, but the effectiveness of this commitment for protecting biodiversity depends on where new protected areas are located. Threshold- and complementarity-based approaches have been independently used to identify important sites for biodiversity. We brought together these approaches by performing a complementarity-based analysis of irreplaceability in important bird and biodiversity areas (IBAs), which are sites identified using a threshold-based approach. We determined whether irreplaceability values are higher inside than outside IBAs and whether any observed difference depends on known characteristics of the IBAs. We focused on 3 regions with comprehensive IBA inventories and bird distribution atlases: Australia, southern Africa, and Europe. Irreplaceability values were significantly higher inside than outside IBAs, although differences were much smaller in Europe than elsewhere. Higher irreplaceability values in IBAs were associated with the presence and number of restricted-range species; number of criteria under which the site was identified; and mean geographic range size of the species for which the site was identified (trigger species). In addition, IBAs were characterized by higher irreplaceability values when using proportional species representation targets, rather than fixed targets. There were broadly comparable results when measuring irreplaceability for trigger species and when considering all bird species, which indicates a good surrogacy effect of the former. Recently, the International Union for Conservation of Nature has convened a consultation to consolidate global standards for the identification of key biodiversity areas (KBAs), building from existing approaches such as IBAs. Our results informed this consultation, and in particular a proposed irreplaceability criterion that will allow the new KBA standard to draw on the strengths of both threshold- and complementarity-based approaches.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Keywords:complementarity, convention on biological diversity, irreplaceability, key biodiversity areas, restricted-range species, systematic conservation planning, threatened species
Research Division:Environmental Sciences
Research Group:Environmental Science and Management
Research Field:Conservation and Biodiversity
Objective Division:Environment
Objective Group:Ecosystem Assessment and Management
Objective Field:Ecosystem Assessment and Management at Regional or Larger Scales
Author:Brooks, T (Dr Thomas Brooks)
ID Code:117490
Year Published:2016
Web of Science® Times Cited:9
Deposited By:Geography and Spatial Science
Deposited On:2017-06-16
Last Modified:2017-10-31
Downloads:0

Repository Staff Only: item control page