eCite Digital Repository
Bolder science needed now for protected areas
Citation
Watson, JEM and Darling, ES and Venter, O and Maron, M and Walston, J and Possingham, HP and Dudley, N and Hockings, M and Barnes, M and Brooks, TM, Bolder science needed now for protected areas, Conservation Biology, 30, (2) pp. 243-248. ISSN 0888-8892 (2016) [Refereed Article]
Copyright Statement
Copyright 2016 Society for Conservation Biology
Abstract
Recognizing that protected areas (PAs) are essential for effective biodiversity conservation action, the Convention on Biological Diversity established ambitious PA targets as part of the 2020 Strategic Plan for Biodiversity. Under the strategic goal to "improve the status of biodiversity by safeguarding ecosystems, species, and genetic diversity," Target 11 aims to put 17% of terrestrial and 10% of marine regions under PA status by 2020. Additionally and crucially, these areas are required to be of particular importance for biodiversity and ecosystem services, effectively and equitably managed, ecologically representative, and well-connected and to include "other effective area-based conservation measures" (OECMs). Whereas the area-based targets are explicit and measurable, the lack of guidance for what constitutes important and representative; effective; and OECMs is affecting how nations are implementing the target. There is a real risk that Target 11 may be achieved in terms of area while failing the overall strategic goal for which it is established because the areas are poorly located, inadequately managed, or based on unjustifiable inclusion of OECMs. We argue that the conservation science community can help establish ecologically sensible PA targets to help prioritize important biodiversity areas and achieve ecological representation; identify clear, comparable performance metrics of ecological effectiveness so progress toward these targets can be assessed; and identify metrics and report on the contribution OECMs make toward the target. By providing ecologically sensible targets and new performance metrics for measuring the effectiveness of both PAs and OECMs, the science community can actively ensure that the achievement of the required area in Target 11 is not simply an end in itself but generates genuine benefits for biodiversity.
Item Details
Item Type: | Refereed Article |
---|---|
Keywords: | Aichi Target 11, CBD, environmental policy, resilience, targets, threatened species conservation, World Parks Congress |
Research Division: | Human Society |
Research Group: | Policy and administration |
Research Field: | Environment policy |
Objective Division: | Environmental Policy, Climate Change and Natural Hazards |
Objective Group: | Environmental policy, legislation and standards |
Objective Field: | Environmental policy, legislation and standards not elsewhere classified |
UTAS Author: | Brooks, TM (Dr Thomas Brooks) |
ID Code: | 117489 |
Year Published: | 2016 |
Web of Science® Times Cited: | 99 |
Deposited By: | Geography and Spatial Science |
Deposited On: | 2017-06-16 |
Last Modified: | 2017-11-27 |
Downloads: | 0 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page