eCite Digital Repository

Last Word on Point:Counterpoint: High altitude is/is not for the birds!

Citation

Hawkes, LA and Scott, GR and Meir, JU and Frappell, PB and Milsom, WK, Last Word on Point:Counterpoint: High altitude is/is not for the birds!, Journal of Applied Physiology, 111, (5) pp. 1525. ISSN 8750-7587 (2011) [Letter or Note in Journal]


Preview
PDF
Pending copyright assessment - Request a copy
32Kb
  

DOI: doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01124.2011

Abstract

to the editor: We would like to thank the scientists who commented on this Point:Counterpoint. We originally argued that high altitude is for the birds because of several unique features that should improve their ability to exercise at extremely high altitudes (4). Many authors agreed with our Point, but several others highlighted the impressive ability of other vertebrates to tolerate hypoxia. These animals are indeed exceptional [Casey (1) in fact cites work by one of us (Meir) on these animals!], and we do not dispute the striking tolerance of acute, transient hypoxia by diving mammals (or by some birds, like penguins) or of chronic hypoxia/anoxia by carp, turtles, or hibernators. However, these animals use entirely different strategies in hypoxia, such as metabolic suppression, and they cannot compare with flying birds in their ability to sustain high rates of aerobic metabolism during prolonged exercise in hypoxia.

Item Details

Item Type:Letter or Note in Journal
Keywords:letter, altitude, birds, response
Research Division:Biological Sciences
Research Group:Evolutionary Biology
Research Field:Animal Systematics and Taxonomy
Objective Division:Environment
Objective Group:Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity
Objective Field:Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity at Regional or Larger Scales
Author:Frappell, PB (Professor Peter Frappell)
ID Code:117041
Year Published:2011
Deposited By:Zoology
Deposited On:2017-05-29
Last Modified:2017-05-29
Downloads:0

Repository Staff Only: item control page