University of Tasmania
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Reintroduction of Tasmanian devils to mainland Australia can restore top-down control in ecosystems where dingoes have been extirpated: A response to Baker et al. 2016 and Fancourt & Mooney 2016

journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-22, 00:30 authored by Hunter, DO, Britz, T, Menna JonesMenna Jones, Letnic, M
Conservation translocations are inherently risky. One way managers can attempt to mitigate some of the risk is by using models to understand the outcomes that a reintroduction may have on an ecosystem and its species. Hunter et al. (2015) used fuzzy cognitive modelling (FCM) to predict the ecological responses of forested ecosystems of mainland Australia to the removal and introduction of predators; namely dingoes, foxes and Tasmanian devils. Hunter et al. (2015) parameterized the interaction strength matrix in their models using effect sizes gleaned from previous studies of predator manipulations and where this data was lacking, qualitative estimates of interaction strengths. Here, we respond to the comments on Hunter et al. (2015) provided by Baker et al. (2016) and Fancourt and Mooney (2016).

History

Publication title

Biological Conservation

Volume

196

Pagination

20-21

ISSN

0006-3207

Department/School

School of Natural Sciences

Publisher

Elsevier Sci Ltd

Place of publication

The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford, England, Oxon, Ox5 1Gb

Repository Status

  • Restricted

Socio-economic Objectives

Terrestrial biodiversity

Usage metrics

    University Of Tasmania

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC