eCite Digital Repository

More than a name: heterogeneity in characteristics of models of maternity care reported from the Australian Maternity Care Classification System validation study

Citation

Donnolley, N and Chambers, G and Butler-Henderson, K and Chapman, M and Sullivan, E, More than a name: heterogeneity in characteristics of models of maternity care reported from the Australian Maternity Care Classification System validation study, Women and Birth ISSN 1871-5192 (In Press) [Refereed Article]

DOI: doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2017.01.005

Abstract

© 2017 Australian College of Midwives Background Without a standard terminology to classify models of maternity care, it is problematic to compare and evaluate clinical outcomes across different models. The Maternity Care Classification System is a novel system developed in Australia to classify models of maternity care based on their characteristics and an overarching broad model descriptor (Major Model Category). Aim This study aimed to assess the extent of variability in the defining characteristics of models of care grouped to the same Major Model Category, using the Maternity Care Classification System. Method All public hospital maternity services in New South Wales, Australia, were invited to complete a web-based survey classifying two local models of care using the Maternity Care Classification System. A descriptive analysis of the variation in 15 attributes of models of care was conducted to evaluate the level of heterogeneity within and across Major Model Categories. Results Sixty-nine out of seventy hospitals responded, classifying 129 models of care. There was wide variation in a number of important attributes of models classified to the same Major Model Category. The category of ‘Public hospital maternity care’ contained the most variation across all characteristics. Conclusion This study demonstrated that although models of care can be grouped into a distinct set of Major Model Categories, there are significant variations in models of the same type. This could result in seemingly ‘like’ models of care being incorrectly compared if grouped only by the Major Model Category.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Research Division:Medical and Health Sciences
Research Group:Public Health and Health Services
Research Field:Health Care Administration
Objective Division:Health
Objective Group:Clinical Health (Organs, Diseases and Abnormal Conditions)
Objective Field:Reproductive System and Disorders
Author:Butler-Henderson, K (Dr Kerryn Butler-Henderson)
ID Code:116028
Year Published:In Press
Deposited By:Tasmanian School of Business and Economics
Deposited On:2017-04-28
Last Modified:2017-04-28
Downloads:0

Repository Staff Only: item control page