Preview

PDF 336Kb

In charting out the ‘four ways’ of eco‐global criminology, this paper discusses the importance of recognising and acting in regards to the differences evident in (1) ways of being (ontology), (2) ways of knowing (epistemology), (3) ways of doing (methodology) and (4) ways of valuing (axiology). The paper assumes and asserts that global study of environmental crime is essential to the green criminology project, and particularly an ecoglobal criminology approach. Specific instances of criminal and harmful activity therefore need to be analysed in the context of broad international social, political, economic and ecological processes. The article outlines the key ideas of eco‐global criminology, a perspective that argues that global study must always be inclusive of voices from the periphery and margins of the world’s metropolitan centres, and critical of the social relations that sustain the epistemological as well as material realities and legacies of colonialism and imperialism. Yet, in doing so, there arise many paradoxes and conundrums that likewise warrant close attention.

Item Type:	Refereed Article
Keywords:	eco-global criminology, environmental harm, Indigenous experiences, elder knowledge
Research Division:	Human Society
Research Group:	Criminology
Research Field:	Criminology not elsewhere classified
Objective Division:	Law, Politics and Community Services
Objective Group:	Justice and the law
Objective Field:	Justice and the law not elsewhere classified
UTAS Author:	White, R (Professor Rob White)
ID Code:	115638
Year Published:	2016
Deposited By:	School of Social Sciences
Deposited On:	2017-04-03
Last Modified:	2017-06-27
Downloads:	180 View Download Statistics