eCite Digital Repository

Teaching peritoneal dialysis in Australia: an opportunity for improvement

Citation

Boudville, N and Cho, Y and Equinox, KL and Figueiredo, AE and Hawley, CM and Howard, K and Johnson, DW and Jose, M and Lee, A and Maley, MAL and Moodie, J and Pascoe, EM and Steiner, GZ and Tomlins, M and Voss, D and Chow, J, Teaching peritoneal dialysis in Australia: an opportunity for improvement, Nephrology Article Epub ahead of print. ISSN 1320-5358 (2017) [Refereed Article]


Preview
PDF (Accepted manuscript)
Available from 03 January 2018
218Kb
  

Copyright Statement

Copyright 2017 John Wiley & Sons

DOI: doi:10.1111/nep.12992

Abstract

Introduction: Up to a 10-fold difference in clinical outcomes between Australian peritoneal dialysis (PD) units exists. There is an international focus on the harmonisation of educational practices in PD to determine whether this may lead to improved patient outcomes.

Aims: Evaluate the current teaching practices of nurses and patients in Australian PD units.

Methods: An online survey with questions on nurse and patient training was made available to PD units in Australia.

Results: Thirty-eight (70%) of 54 PD units in Australia completed the survey. A written standardised curricula was utilised in 21 units (55%) for nursing staff and 30 units (86%) for patients, with 22% and 12% including an electronic delivery component for each group respectively. Universal teaching of adult learning principles was not demonstrated. The hours spent on teaching nursing staff ranged from <15 hours in 24% to >100 hours in 21% of units. The average number of hours spent by nurses each day to train patients ranged from <2 hours in 14% to >6 hours in 11% of units, with the average total training days ranging from 2-3 days in 14% to over 7 days in 14% of units. Staff and patient competency assessments were performed routinely in 37% and 74% of units respectively.

Conclusions: Considerable differences exist amongst Australian PD units in the education of staff and patients. There is a general lack of delivery and competency assessment to meet educational standards. It remains to be seen if harmonisation of educational curricula can translate to improved clinical outcomes.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Keywords:Peritoneal dialysis Teaching
Research Division:Medical and Health Sciences
Research Group:Clinical Sciences
Research Field:Nephrology and Urology
Objective Division:Health
Objective Group:Clinical Health (Organs, Diseases and Abnormal Conditions)
Objective Field:Urogenital System and Disorders
Author:Jose, M (Professor Matthew Jose)
Author:Chow, J (Associate Professor Josephine Chow)
ID Code:113796
Year Published:2017
Deposited By:Medicine (Discipline)
Deposited On:2017-01-20
Last Modified:2017-05-15
Downloads:0

Repository Staff Only: item control page