eCite Digital Repository

Gold’s heaviness and malleability

Citation

Steen, AP, Gold's heaviness and malleability, Proceedings of the Society of Architectural Historians, Australia and New Zealand: 33, Gold, 06-09 July 2016, Melbourne, pp. 648-656. ISBN 9780734052650 (2016) [Refereed Conference Paper]


Preview
PDF (Paper in Proceedings of 33rd Annual Conference of the Society of Architectural Historians Australia and New Zealand)
546Kb
  

Copyright Statement

Copyright unknown

Official URL: http://sahanz2016.msd.unimelb.edu.au/

Abstract

Assemblage 13, December, 1990, includes Ann Bergren’s "Gold’s Gym in Venice, Ca." In this text, Bergren, Associate Professor of Classics at the University of California and architectural theory teacher at Southern California Institute of Architecture, submits one eccentric work of architecture to a feminist poststructuralist reading. "Gold’s Gym in Venice, Ca." exercises richness and poorness, excess and lack, beauty and grotesqueness, drugs, myth, and religion. It actively challenges architecture’s practices of interpretation, definition, and ability to deal with difference. It is a complex, non-linear, and experimental text, highly articulated yet unambiguously heavy. Assemblage 15, August, 1991, includes Rob Miller’s "A Punchlist for ‘Gold’s Gym’: The Echoing of a Dumbbell." In this text, Miller, practising architect and teacher at Clemson University and Georgia Institute of Technology, directly responds to "Gold’s Gym in Venice Ca." He enacts a so-called "re:assemblage" of "Gold’s Gym in Venice, Ca." In so doing, he responds to the challenges that text presents architecture and architects of the type that Miller self-ascribes. This paper will examine Miller’s article in relation to Bergren’s and Miller’s re:assemblage in relation to Bergren’s assemblage. It will interrogate Miller’s attempts to use conceptual apparatuses formed by Umberto Eco, most centrally the open work, to refigure Bergren’s text. As such, the paper will trace an attempt at discursive remoulding. It will critique one architectural history text’s attempt to control reading and writing of another text, and itself. In conclusion, the paper will reinforce the value of heavy, reflective, and reflexive texts for architectural discourse and disciplinary intellection.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Conference Paper
Keywords:architecture theory, structuralism, poststructuralism
Research Division:Built Environment and Design
Research Group:Architecture
Research Field:Architectural history, theory and criticism
Objective Division:Culture and Society
Objective Group:Communication
Objective Field:Communication not elsewhere classified
UTAS Author:Steen, AP (Dr Andrew Steen)
ID Code:113730
Year Published:2016
Deposited By:Architecture and Design
Deposited On:2017-01-17
Last Modified:2017-08-07
Downloads:126 View Download Statistics

Repository Staff Only: item control page