eCite Digital Repository
Working in triads: A case study of a peer review process
Citation
Grainger, P and Bridgstock, M and Houston, T and Drew, S, Working in triads: A case study of a peer review process, Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 12, (1) pp. 1-25. ISSN 1449-9789 (2015) [Refereed Article]
 | PDF Restricted - Request a copy 205Kb |
Copyright Statement
Copyright 2015 JUTLP
Official URL: http://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/
Abstract
Peer review of teaching has become an accepted educational procedure in Australia to quality assure the
quality of teaching practices. The institutional implementation of the peer review process can be viewed as
genuine desire to improve teaching quality or an imposition from above as a measure of accountability and
performativity. One approach is to conduct the peer review process as a team or a triad, involving a group of
three academics. This article reviews this process of peer review through the eyes of the participants. The
results of the study indicate that the peer review process upon which this study is based, has the potential to
not only significantly impact academics’ pedagogy but to improve teaching confidence and associated benefits
in regard to evidence based teaching for promotional opportunities.
Item Details
| Item Type: | Refereed Article |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | peer review of teaching, triads, success factors, case study |
| Research Division: | Education |
| Research Group: | Specialist Studies in Education |
| Research Field: | Education Assessment and Evaluation |
| Objective Division: | Education and Training |
| Objective Group: | Other Education and Training |
| Objective Field: | Education and Training not elsewhere classified |
| Author: | Drew, S (Dr Steve Drew) |
| ID Code: | 111732 |
| Year Published: | 2015 |
| Deposited By: | Tasmanian Institute of Learning & Teaching |
| Deposited On: | 2016-10-04 |
| Last Modified: | 2016-11-08 |
| Downloads: | 0 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page