This study presents a test of the Yerkes-Dodson Law (YDL; Yerkes and Dodson, 1908), which is understood to predict a negative quadratic relationship between arousal and performance ('inverted-U' hypothesis), and a lower level of arousal for optimal performance on more difficult tasks than easier tasks ('task difficulty' hypothesis). A number of recent studies (e.g. Neiss, 1988) have questioned the validity of the YDL on several grounds: the confusion of theory and model; observed linear arousal-performance relationships; non-specific definitions of arousal; and poor experimental design. A single-blind modified version of Anderson's (1994) within-subjects study (N = 10) was performed, utilizing graded cortical arousal manipulations of caffeine (100 mg cumulative dosages to a maximum of 600 mg), and four tests of basic cognitive ability in the procedural alphanumerical domain (with counterbalancing of drug/placebo session and ordering of presentations of tasks). The 'inverted-U' hypothesis was supported in three out of four experimental conditions (easy and difficult numerical, and difficult alphabetical tasks; p < 0.05). No support was found for the task difficulty hypothesis. The results are discussed in terms of the emergence of nonlinearity in neural-cognitive interactions as a fundamental quality of drug-behaviour interactions.

Item Type:	Refereed Article
Research Division:	Psychology and Cognitive Sciences
Research Group:	Psychology
Research Field:	Biological Psychology (Neuropsychology, Psychopharmacology, Physiological Psychology)
Objective Division:	Expanding Knowledge
Objective Group:	Expanding Knowledge
Objective Field:	Expanding Knowledge through Studies of Human Society
UTAS Author:	Watters, PA (Mr Paul Andrew Watters)
UTAS Author:	Martin, F (Associate Professor Frances Martin)
UTAS Author:	Schreter, ZG (Dr Schreter)
ID Code:	11052
Year Published:	1997
Web of Science® Times Cited:	30
Deposited By:	Psychology
Deposited On:	1997-08-01
Last Modified:	2011-08-11
Downloads:	0