eCite Digital Repository

'Sharing' Background Measurements in Wavelength Dispersive Electron Probe Microanalysis

Citation

Goemann, K and Donovan, JJ and Feig, ST and Thompson, J, 'Sharing' Background Measurements in Wavelength Dispersive Electron Probe Microanalysis, Electron Probe Microanalysis Topical Conference (EPMA 2016) Program Guide, 16-19 May 2016, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, pp. 28-29. ISBN 978-1-5323-0217-6 (2016) [Conference Extract]


Preview
PDF
Pending copyright assessment - Request a copy
447Kb
  

Abstract

Wavelength dispersive x-ray spectrometry in electron probe microanalysis requires subtraction of the Bremsstrahlung background, which is usually done by measuring the intensity in 1-2 positions close to the peak. Accurate background determination is crucial in trace element analysis where the peak to background ratio is low. To improve accuracy the multi-point background (MPB) technique has recently been developed, where the background is measured in multiple positions for each line, followed by fitting a curve to the background data. Compromised backgrounds can be excluded automatically or manually. MPB is well suited for high accuracy analysis of complex phases such as monazites, but acquiring multiple backgrounds for many elements can substantially increase the total acquisition time, which reduces throughput and can also aggravate electron beam irradiation effects. Backgrounds of neighbouring x-ray lines are also often measured in similar absolute positions.

We present a method to reassign conventional off-peak backgrounds (2 per element) to all elements measured on the same monochromator and process the data in the same way as for MPB, e.g., if 4 elements were acquired on a spectrometer, each element has an MPB array of 8 points after background "sharing". The final point selection for background fitting is optimized during postprocessing. As an example, wavescans and 30 point measurements were acquired on a natural scheelite crystal using a Cameca SX100. Settings and results are given in Table 1. The 3 datasets are based on the same measurements with the only difference being the background correction. The material shows considerable inhomogeneity, but for most elements the variations are within the precision and the levels below the detection limit of the method, hence the challenge in these cases is to accurately measure zero.

Item Details

Item Type:Conference Extract
Keywords:electron probe microanalysis, background correction, complex minerals, scheelite, monazite, sulphides
Research Division:Physical Sciences
Research Group:Condensed Matter Physics
Research Field:Surfaces and Structural Properties of Condensed Matter
Objective Division:Mineral Resources (excl. Energy Resources)
Objective Group:Primary Mining and Extraction Processes of Mineral Resources
Objective Field:Mining and Extraction of Titanium Minerals, Zircon, and Rare Earth Metal Ores (e.g. Monazite)
Author:Goemann, K (Dr Karsten Goemann)
Author:Feig, ST (Dr Sandrin Feig)
Author:Thompson, J (Mr Jay Thompson)
ID Code:109838
Year Published:2016
Deposited By:Central Science Laboratory
Deposited On:2016-07-04
Last Modified:2016-07-05
Downloads:0

Repository Staff Only: item control page