eCite Digital Repository

Guerrilla in the midst: the Universitas Project and a new type of institution


Steen, AP, Guerrilla in the midst: the Universitas Project and a new type of institution, Proceedings of the Society of Architectural Historians Australia and New Zealand: Architecture, Institutions and Change, 07-10 July, Sydney, Australia, pp. 640-651. ISBN 9780646942988 (2015) [Refereed Conference Paper]

Restricted - Request a copy

Copyright Statement

Copyright unknown

Official URL:


The Universitas Project was the brainchild of Institute of Architecture and Urban Studies co-founder and Museum of Modern Art Curator of Design, Emilio Ambasz. In 1971 Ambasz sent his "Project Working Paper" to an extensive list of intellectuals ranging from Kenneth Frampton to Michel Foucault, Denise Scott Brown to Roland Barthes. Ambasz’s document, colloquially named "The Black Book," called for the creation of a "new type of institution" to be built in New York state. The goal was to design the structure and the curriculum of this "Universitas" to help educate architects and designers for what Ambasz defines "a post-technological society." Ambasz solicited "critical essays" from the respondents that addressed "The Black Book" and spoke to his reformist educational and institutional agenda.

Italian semiotician Umberto Eco replied with the parodically-titled and -framed "Critical Essay". In this piece, Eco outlines a kind of non-university: a network-based model of education "by the masses" not merely "for" them. In outlining the relation of his "new university" to existing knowledge, Eco inserts a translated extract from Mao Zedong’s On Practice: "To acquire knowledge it is necessary to participate in the process which transforms reality. To get to know the taste of a pear it is necessary to transform it by eating it." These sentences help figure Eco’s argument. They indirectly capture the system of relation and the spirit of engagement he advocates. But the quotation also exercises the poetic function of language. It opens the "Critical Essay" to readings outside strict referential meaning. The message challenges the basic premises of Ambasz’s Universitas.

This paper takes Mao’s quotation as a lens through which to understand Eco’s "Critical Essay". It founds a semantic chain that opens Ambasz’s Universitas Project to cultural slippage and ideological contestation. Eco’s little "Black Book" response is presented here as non-institutional: a guerrilla incursion into so-called critical architectural discourse.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Conference Paper
Keywords:architectural discourse, Umberto Eco
Research Division:Built Environment and Design
Research Group:Architecture
Research Field:Architectural history, theory and criticism
Objective Division:Culture and Society
Objective Group:Communication
Objective Field:Communication not elsewhere classified
UTAS Author:Steen, AP (Dr Andrew Steen)
ID Code:107414
Year Published:2015
Deposited By:Architecture
Deposited On:2016-03-15
Last Modified:2018-03-20

Repository Staff Only: item control page