eCite Digital Repository

Fire frequency is relatively more important than fire size a reply to Russell-Smith et al

Citation

Griffiths, AD and Garnett, ST and Brook, BW, Fire frequency is relatively more important than fire size a reply to Russell-Smith et al, Biological Conservation, 192 pp. 478. ISSN 0006-3207 (2015) [Letter or Note in Journal]


Preview
PDF (Griffith et al 2015b - Letter - Biol Conserv)
Pending copyright assessment - Request a copy
143Kb
  

DOI: doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2015.09.026

Abstract

We thank Russell-Smith et al. (this volume) for their critical reflection on our study (Griffiths et al., 2015). Their key argument is that the experimental compartments at Kapalga thatwe used in the population viability analysis were unrepresentative in relation to fire size and intensity across the mesic savannas of northern Australia. Specifically, they recommend the results of our study be "interpreted carefully" because the experimental design at Kapalga resulted in higher intensity fires and compartments were larger than average fires in the region. This is a legitimate point, but it is important to clarify the broader context in which our modelling might be applied.

Item Details

Item Type:Letter or Note in Journal
Keywords:fire, mammal, conservation, tropical
Research Division:Environmental Sciences
Research Group:Environmental Science and Management
Research Field:Wildlife and Habitat Management
Objective Division:Environment
Objective Group:Ecosystem Assessment and Management
Objective Field:Ecosystem Assessment and Management at Regional or Larger Scales
Author:Brook, BW (Professor Barry Brook)
ID Code:107151
Year Published:2015
Deposited By:Plant Science
Deposited On:2016-03-07
Last Modified:2016-03-07
Downloads:0

Repository Staff Only: item control page