Confidence judgments about the quality of memory can have serious implications in eyewitness settings. Three experiments investigated the effect of eye-closure during eyewitness interviews on confidence-accuracy relations in event recall. In all experiments, participants viewed video-taped events and were subsequently questioned about the event, while they had their eyes open or closed. Participants provided confidence ratings for each response. We found that participants were generally able to monitor the accuracy of their responses, although they displayed underconfidence for imprecise responses. Importantly, across all experiments, eye-closure increased accuracy without significantly inflating confidence or impairing confidence-accuracy relations. Moreover, in Experiment 3, reducing distraction (e.g., through eye-closure) significantly reduced overconfidence. Thus, unlike most other investigative interview protocols that facilitate recall, eye-closure improves recall accuracy with no apparent cost, and some evidence of benefit, to metamemory. Practical implications of these findings are discussed, and hypotheses regarding potential theoretical mechanisms are proposed.

Item Type:	Refereed Article
Keywords:	eyewitness memory, metacognitive monitoring, eye-closure, confidence-accuracy calibration, overconfidence, precision
Research Division:	Psychology and Cognitive Sciences
Research Group:	Psychology
Research Field:	Forensic Psychology
Objective Division:	Expanding Knowledge
Objective Group:	Expanding Knowledge
Objective Field:	Expanding Knowledge in Psychology and Cognitive Sciences
UTAS Author:	Sauer, JD (Dr Jim Sauer)
ID Code:	103275
Year Published:	2015
Web of Science® Times Cited:	6
Deposited By:	Psychology
Deposited On:	2015-10-01
Last Modified:	2017-10-31
Downloads:	0