eCite Digital Repository
Can that work for us? Analysing Organisational, Group and Individual Factors for Successful, Health Services Innovation
Citation
Eljiz, K and Hayes, K and Dadich, A and Fitzgerald, J and Sloan, T and Kobilski, S, Can that work for us? Analysing Organisational, Group and Individual Factors for Successful, Health Services Innovation, Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management, 6, (2) pp. 280-292. ISSN 1833-3818 (2011) [Refereed Article]
Copyright Statement
Copyright unknown
Official URL: http://www.achsm.org.au/education/journal/
Abstract
Objective: Process innovations can increase efficiency
and quality in service organisations. [1,2] Health
services organisations have been criticised for being
slow to exploit process-management innovations. [3,4]
To address perceived deficiencies, this article combines
knowledge of factors that improve the Diffusion of
Innovation (DoI) in health services organisations [5]
with organisational behaviour theory [6] to produce a
practical tool to assist health managers and clinicians
assess the likelihood of an innovation succeeding in
their organisation.
Design: Semi-structured interviews were used to identify
and analyse organisational, group and individual factors
supporting or impeding the implementation of process
changes in a public hospital sonography department.
Setting: Emergency and imaging departments within a
public hospital in New South Wales.
Results: Using extant research literature and data
collected from the hospital, a checklist was developed
to identify factors that aid the implementation of
Introduction
This article examines and illustrates factors which can
influence the Diffusion of Innovation (DoI) within health
services settings. First, current knowledge of DoI in health
services [5] is used to develop tables of organisational, group
innovations within health services settings. The
checklist prompts people responsible for innovation
implementation to consider key factors that influence
the DoI, identify gaps between the current and desired
states and develop action plans to address these gaps.
Conclusions: The checklist developed in this article
helps health personnel predict the likelihood of
innovation adoption, and identify gaps to the ideal
state at organisational, group and individual levels.
The necessity of conscious change management when
implementing innovations is also addressed. Given
impending national healthcare reforms, this article is
both important and timely.
Abbreviations: DoI – Diffusion of Innovation;
OECD – Organisation for Economic Cooperation and
Development.
Key words: diffusion of innovation; innovation;
implementation; public hospital; animated computer
simulation.
Item Details
Item Type: | Refereed Article |
---|---|
Research Division: | Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services |
Research Group: | Strategy, management and organisational behaviour |
Research Field: | Organisational planning and management |
Objective Division: | Health |
Objective Group: | Evaluation of health and support services |
Objective Field: | Evaluation of health and support services not elsewhere classified |
UTAS Author: | Eljiz, K (Dr Kathy Eljiz) |
ID Code: | 100967 |
Year Published: | 2011 |
Deposited By: | Faculty of Business |
Deposited On: | 2015-06-04 |
Last Modified: | 2017-11-27 |
Downloads: | 0 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page