University of Tasmania
Browse
100740.pdf (649.63 kB)

Meta-analysis of data from animal studies: a practical guide

Download (649.63 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-18, 10:23 authored by Vesterinen, HM, Sena, ES, Egan, KJ, Hirst, TC, Churolov, L, Currie, GL, Antonic, A, David Howells, Macleod, MR
Meta-analyses of data from human studies are invaluable resources in the life sciences and the methods to conduct these are well documented. Similarly there are a number of benefits in conducting meta-analyses on data from animal studies; they can be used to inform clinical trial design, or to try and explain discrepancies between preclinical and clinical trial results. However there are inherit differences between animal and human studies and so applying the same techniques for the meta-analysis of preclinical data is not straightforward. For example preclinical studies are frequently small and there is often substantial heterogeneity between studies. This may have an impact on both the method of calculating an effect size and the method of pooling data. Here we describe a practical guide for the meta-analysis of data from animal studies including methods used to explore sources of heterogeneity.

History

Publication title

Journal of neuroscience methods

Volume

15

Issue

221

Pagination

92-102

ISSN

0165-0270

Department/School

Tasmanian School of Medicine

Publisher

Elsevier Science Bv

Place of publication

Holland

Rights statement

Copyright 2013 The Authors. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/

Repository Status

  • Open

Socio-economic Objectives

Expanding knowledge in the health sciences

Usage metrics

    University Of Tasmania

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC