eCite Digital Repository

On the Ternary Relation and Conditionality

Citation

Beall, Jc and Brady, R and Dunn, JM and Hazen, AP and Mares, E and Meyer, RK and Priest, G and Restall, G and Ripley, D and Slaney, J and Sylvan, R, On the Ternary Relation and Conditionality, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 41, (3) pp. 595-612. ISSN 0022-3611 (2012) [Refereed Article]

Copyright Statement

Copyright 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

DOI: doi:10.1007/s10992-011-9191-5

Abstract

One of the most dominant approaches to semantics for relevant (and many paraconsistent) logics is the Routley–Meyer semantics involving a ternary relation on points. To some (many?), this ternary relation has seemed like a technical trick devoid of an intuitively appealing philosophical story that connects it up with conditionality in general. In this paper, we respond to this worry by providing three different philosophical accounts of the ternary relation that correspond to three conceptions of conditionality. We close by briefly discussing a general conception of conditionality that may unify the three given conceptions.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Research Division:Philosophy and Religious Studies
Research Group:Philosophy
Research Field:Philosophy not elsewhere classified
Objective Division:Expanding Knowledge
Objective Group:Expanding Knowledge
Objective Field:Expanding Knowledge in Philosophy and Religious Studies
Author:Beall, Jc (Professor JC Beall)
ID Code:100284
Year Published:2012
Web of Science® Times Cited:16
Deposited By:Humanities
Deposited On:2015-05-08
Last Modified:2015-08-25
Downloads:0

Repository Staff Only: item control page