eCite Digital Repository
On the Ternary Relation and Conditionality
Citation
Beall, Jc and Brady, R and Dunn, JM and Hazen, AP and Mares, E and Meyer, RK and Priest, G and Restall, G and Ripley, D and Slaney, J and Sylvan, R, On the Ternary Relation and Conditionality, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 41, (3) pp. 595-612. ISSN 0022-3611 (2012) [Refereed Article]
Copyright Statement
Copyright 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
DOI: doi:10.1007/s10992-011-9191-5
Abstract
One of the most dominant approaches to semantics for relevant
(and many paraconsistent) logics is the Routley–Meyer semantics involving a
ternary relation on points. To some (many?), this ternary relation has seemed
like a technical trick devoid of an intuitively appealing philosophical story
that connects it up with conditionality in general. In this paper, we respond
to this worry by providing three different philosophical accounts of the ternary
relation that correspond to three conceptions of conditionality. We close by
briefly discussing a general conception of conditionality that may unify the
three given conceptions.
Item Details
| Item Type: | Refereed Article |
|---|---|
| Research Division: | Philosophy and Religious Studies |
| Research Group: | Philosophy |
| Research Field: | Philosophy not elsewhere classified |
| Objective Division: | Expanding Knowledge |
| Objective Group: | Expanding knowledge |
| Objective Field: | Expanding knowledge in philosophy and religious studies |
| UTAS Author: | Beall, Jc (Professor JC Beall) |
| ID Code: | 100284 |
| Year Published: | 2012 |
| Web of Science® Times Cited: | 43 |
| Deposited By: | School of Humanities |
| Deposited On: | 2015-05-08 |
| Last Modified: | 2017-11-09 |
| Downloads: | 0 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page